https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342009 The court directed the petitioner to apply for revival with the Registrar of Companies within four weeks, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements. The decision did not address the validity of PIPDIC's order, leaving parties to resolve related disputes through appropriate forums. The court underscored the importance of statutory compliance and due process for company revival, stating that the Registrar would evaluate the application based on complete documentation. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342009 The court directed the petitioner to apply for revival with the Registrar of Companies within four weeks, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements. The decision did not address the validity of PIPDIC's order, leaving parties to resolve related disputes through appropriate forums. The court underscored the importance of statutory compliance and due process for company revival, stating that the Registrar would evaluate the application based on complete documentation. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342009