<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 972 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342002</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the penalty under Section 13 of the Interest-Tax Act, 1974, was not applicable as the assessee had not concealed particulars of interest or furnished inaccurate particulars. The appeal was dismissed, and the substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:54:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 972 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342002</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the penalty under Section 13 of the Interest-Tax Act, 1974, was not applicable as the assessee had not concealed particulars of interest or furnished inaccurate particulars. The appeal was dismissed, and the substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>