<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 970 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342000</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the Tax Case (Appeal) by remanding the first and second issues back to the assessing officer for fresh consideration regarding the deduction of bad debts and long-term capital loss on the sale of shares. The court rejected the third issue of business loss from the cancellation of a hire purchase agreement due to lack of substantiation. No costs were awarded, and the miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 970 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342000</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the Tax Case (Appeal) by remanding the first and second issues back to the assessing officer for fresh consideration regarding the deduction of bad debts and long-term capital loss on the sale of shares. The court rejected the third issue of business loss from the cancellation of a hire purchase agreement due to lack of substantiation. No costs were awarded, and the miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>