<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 967 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341997</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the interest expenditure incurred by the partnership firm on account of interest paid to partners, holding it cannot be disallowed under Section 14A. However, the issue of investment in real estate and guilt funds was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further investigation. The order was pronounced on 19th April 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 967 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341997</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the interest expenditure incurred by the partnership firm on account of interest paid to partners, holding it cannot be disallowed under Section 14A. However, the issue of investment in real estate and guilt funds was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further investigation. The order was pronounced on 19th April 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>