<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 958 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing specific issues for fresh adjudication. The disallowance under section 14A was referred back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration. The addition under section 2(22)(e) was ruled in favor of the assessee, finding the advance not deemed dividend. The disallowance of interest on loans was set aside for further examination. The confirmation of estimated income from House Property was not extensively discussed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was issued on 12.04.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:53:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 958 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, directing specific issues for fresh adjudication. The disallowance under section 14A was referred back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration. The addition under section 2(22)(e) was ruled in favor of the assessee, finding the advance not deemed dividend. The disallowance of interest on loans was set aside for further examination. The confirmation of estimated income from House Property was not extensively discussed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was issued on 12.04.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>