https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191790 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to stop the respondent from proceeding without complying with Rule 4(3) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 2000. The court held that the petitioner had waived the Rule 4(3) requirement by allowing the inquiry to progress to the final stages, specifically reaching Rule 4(8) with orders reserved. No costs were awarded to the petitioner, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed. en-us Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191790 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to stop the respondent from proceeding without complying with Rule 4(3) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 2000. The court held that the petitioner had waived the Rule 4(3) requirement by allowing the inquiry to progress to the final stages, specifically reaching Rule 4(8) with orders reserved. No costs were awarded to the petitioner, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191790