<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1167 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191774</link>
    <description>The court dismissed Arbitration Petition No.76 of 2012 as not maintainable under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitration Petition No.12 of 2012 was allowed, making the foreign award enforceable. The petitioners were directed to comply with the award, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1167 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191774</link>
      <description>The court dismissed Arbitration Petition No.76 of 2012 as not maintainable under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitration Petition No.12 of 2012 was allowed, making the foreign award enforceable. The petitioners were directed to comply with the award, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>