<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 235 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191778</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deductibility of bonus paid to agricultural staff and workers for assessment years 1962-63 to 1966-67. The court allowed the bonus deduction, considering the assessee&#039;s status as an industry owner. However, the court denied the deduction for provident fund contribution and gratuity without clear evidence of industry ownership. The court also dismissed the challenge on the apportionment of gratuity to the head office staff, citing lack of merit and consistency in the department&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:07:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 235 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191778</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deductibility of bonus paid to agricultural staff and workers for assessment years 1962-63 to 1966-67. The court allowed the bonus deduction, considering the assessee&#039;s status as an industry owner. However, the court denied the deduction for provident fund contribution and gratuity without clear evidence of industry ownership. The court also dismissed the challenge on the apportionment of gratuity to the head office staff, citing lack of merit and consistency in the department&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>