<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Authority Must Consistently Apply Expert Opinions on Poultry Manure in Agricultural Tax Assessments, Rules CIT(A.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34467</link>
    <description>Additions against Sale of manure in the nature of poultry droppings - AO had accepted the expert opinion insofar as it related to feed consumption of bird at 55-60 KGs for 60-weeks. However, when it came to poultry dropping, he refused to consider the opinion of the said expert - CIT(A) was justified in directing the A.O. to accept the expert opinion in toto. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:36:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Authority Must Consistently Apply Expert Opinions on Poultry Manure in Agricultural Tax Assessments, Rules CIT(A.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34467</link>
      <description>Additions against Sale of manure in the nature of poultry droppings - AO had accepted the expert opinion insofar as it related to feed consumption of bird at 55-60 KGs for 60-weeks. However, when it came to poultry dropping, he refused to consider the opinion of the said expert - CIT(A) was justified in directing the A.O. to accept the expert opinion in toto. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:36:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>