https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341984 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a consultancy company, regarding the service tax liability on activities funded by government grants-in-aid. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision to support that such activities did not attract service tax. The appellant was allowed cenvat credit that was initially denied, but the denial of credit for catering services was upheld. The issue of cum-tax benefit was remanded for further verification. The appeals were disposed of accordingly on 19.04.2017. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 17:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341984 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a consultancy company, regarding the service tax liability on activities funded by government grants-in-aid. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision to support that such activities did not attract service tax. The appellant was allowed cenvat credit that was initially denied, but the denial of credit for catering services was upheld. The issue of cum-tax benefit was remanded for further verification. The appeals were disposed of accordingly on 19.04.2017. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341984