https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341983 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail 100% credit of the tax liability paid on security services. The decision emphasized that the notification only governed the distribution of tax liability between the service recipient and provider, not restricting the appellant from claiming full credit if the tax had been discharged and passed on to them. Citing relevant rules and legal precedents, the Tribunal granted the appellant the right to avail the cenvat credit, overturning the department's claim for recovery of allegedly wrongly availed credit. en-us Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341983 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail 100% credit of the tax liability paid on security services. The decision emphasized that the notification only governed the distribution of tax liability between the service recipient and provider, not restricting the appellant from claiming full credit if the tax had been discharged and passed on to them. Citing relevant rules and legal precedents, the Tribunal granted the appellant the right to avail the cenvat credit, overturning the department's claim for recovery of allegedly wrongly availed credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341983