<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 941 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341971</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty amount already paid before the notice and revising the penalty under section 78 to the amount of service tax short paid for GTA services. The penalty under section 77 was sustained, without affecting the confirmed demand or interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:25:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 941 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341971</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty amount already paid before the notice and revising the penalty under section 78 to the amount of service tax short paid for GTA services. The penalty under section 77 was sustained, without affecting the confirmed demand or interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>