<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 936 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341966</link>
    <description>Interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act becomes payable if duty determined under Section 11A is not paid within three months of determination, and the relevant date depends on whether the original demand was merely maintained or was replaced in remand. Where the appellate order only upheld the original demand, the original adjudication date remained the date of determination, so interest was sustained on the duty demand of Rs. 4,12,050/-. Where the original order had been set aside and the matter decided again in de novo adjudication, the de novo order became the operative determination, so interest was not payable on the duty demand of Rs. 6,20,103/-.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 936 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341966</link>
      <description>Interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act becomes payable if duty determined under Section 11A is not paid within three months of determination, and the relevant date depends on whether the original demand was merely maintained or was replaced in remand. Where the appellate order only upheld the original demand, the original adjudication date remained the date of determination, so interest was sustained on the duty demand of Rs. 4,12,050/-. Where the original order had been set aside and the matter decided again in de novo adjudication, the de novo order became the operative determination, so interest was not payable on the duty demand of Rs. 6,20,103/-.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>