<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 935 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of remission of duty due to negligence by the respondents, supported by the Jurisdictional High Court. The Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside duty, interest, and penalties was overturned, emphasizing the finality of the remission issue and negligence in the fire accident. The department&#039;s appeal was allowed, granting consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 935 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of remission of duty due to negligence by the respondents, supported by the Jurisdictional High Court. The Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside duty, interest, and penalties was overturned, emphasizing the finality of the remission issue and negligence in the fire accident. The department&#039;s appeal was allowed, granting consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>