<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 932 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341962</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India addressed contempt of court due to failure to comply with court orders by a party. The court ordered the auction of Aamby Valley City for recovery of dues after the party failed to deposit the required amount in the SEBI Sahara Refund Account. The Official Liquidator was appointed to conduct the sale, with instructions for cooperation from both parties. The judgment emphasized the necessity of personal presence of the parties before the court, warning of non-bailable warrants if directives were not followed. Compliance with court orders and directives was underscored to ensure effective resolution of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 932 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341962</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India addressed contempt of court due to failure to comply with court orders by a party. The court ordered the auction of Aamby Valley City for recovery of dues after the party failed to deposit the required amount in the SEBI Sahara Refund Account. The Official Liquidator was appointed to conduct the sale, with instructions for cooperation from both parties. The judgment emphasized the necessity of personal presence of the parties before the court, warning of non-bailable warrants if directives were not followed. Compliance with court orders and directives was underscored to ensure effective resolution of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>