https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341959 The juridical seat of arbitration determines the court with supervisory control over the arbitral process, and the seat operates like an exclusive jurisdiction clause. The distinction between seat and venue is material: the seat is the legal home of the arbitration, while the venue is only the place for hearings. Where the agreement fixes Mumbai as the seat and also confers exclusive jurisdiction on Mumbai courts, those courts alone have jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings, to the exclusion of all others, including the Delhi High Court. The Supreme Court held that the contrary view was incorrect. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:23:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341959 The juridical seat of arbitration determines the court with supervisory control over the arbitral process, and the seat operates like an exclusive jurisdiction clause. The distinction between seat and venue is material: the seat is the legal home of the arbitration, while the venue is only the place for hearings. Where the agreement fixes Mumbai as the seat and also confers exclusive jurisdiction on Mumbai courts, those courts alone have jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings, to the exclusion of all others, including the Delhi High Court. The Supreme Court held that the contrary view was incorrect. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341959