<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 925 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341955</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the lower authorities&#039; decisions, ruling that the sale of the entire running business constituted a slump sale of a long-term capital asset, not subject to short-term capital gain treatment under Section 50(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing established legal principles and precedents, including the distinction between block asset transfers and selling an entire business as a going concern.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 925 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341955</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the lower authorities&#039; decisions, ruling that the sale of the entire running business constituted a slump sale of a long-term capital asset, not subject to short-term capital gain treatment under Section 50(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing established legal principles and precedents, including the distinction between block asset transfers and selling an entire business as a going concern.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>