<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 917 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341947</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the first and third grounds, concerning the addition of reimbursement of expenses to the head office and the adjustment to sales credit commission earned on behalf of the associated enterprise. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify and grant TDS credit on the second ground related to interest income paid to the head office.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:22:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 917 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341947</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the first and third grounds, concerning the addition of reimbursement of expenses to the head office and the adjustment to sales credit commission earned on behalf of the associated enterprise. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify and grant TDS credit on the second ground related to interest income paid to the head office.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>