<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 912 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee by deleting the addition of rental income and upholding the allowance of expenses. The judgment emphasized the need for supporting evidence to substantiate claims and the permissibility of business-related expenses even in the absence of specific business activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:22:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 912 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee by deleting the addition of rental income and upholding the allowance of expenses. The judgment emphasized the need for supporting evidence to substantiate claims and the permissibility of business-related expenses even in the absence of specific business activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>