<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 910 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the amendment to section 200A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was prospective, not retrospective. As a result, the Assessing Officer (AO) did not have the authority to levy fees under section 234E for late filing of TDS statements before 01.06.2015. The demands raised in the intimations were considered invalid, and all appeals by the assessees were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:22:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 910 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the amendment to section 200A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was prospective, not retrospective. As a result, the Assessing Officer (AO) did not have the authority to levy fees under section 234E for late filing of TDS statements before 01.06.2015. The demands raised in the intimations were considered invalid, and all appeals by the assessees were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>