<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 907 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act due to insufficient evidence for the cessation of liability. However, the disallowances of business promotion expenses and miscellaneous expenses were upheld as the assessee failed to provide adequate documentation to support these expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:22:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 907 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act due to insufficient evidence for the cessation of liability. However, the disallowances of business promotion expenses and miscellaneous expenses were upheld as the assessee failed to provide adequate documentation to support these expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>