<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (2) TMI 40 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7591</link>
    <description>On dissolution of a partnership firm, a partner is entitled only to a share in the net partnership assets after realisation and discharge of liabilities, not to any specific asset. The partner&#039;s entitlement is ascertained as at the date of dissolution, and even an allotment of immovable property in final division is treated as satisfaction of that share rather than conferral of a proprietary interest in that property. Rule 7 governing a partner&#039;s share in an existing partnership did not change the character of the deceased partner&#039;s entitlement in a dissolved firm. The deceased partner&#039;s share was therefore treated as movable property for Estate Duty Act purposes, and the question was answered against the accountable person.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (2) TMI 40 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7591</link>
      <description>On dissolution of a partnership firm, a partner is entitled only to a share in the net partnership assets after realisation and discharge of liabilities, not to any specific asset. The partner&#039;s entitlement is ascertained as at the date of dissolution, and even an allotment of immovable property in final division is treated as satisfaction of that share rather than conferral of a proprietary interest in that property. Rule 7 governing a partner&#039;s share in an existing partnership did not change the character of the deceased partner&#039;s entitlement in a dissolved firm. The deceased partner&#039;s share was therefore treated as movable property for Estate Duty Act purposes, and the question was answered against the accountable person.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>