<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 902 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, a statutory body performing mandatory statutory functions under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, is not liable to pay service tax. The activities, including fund management and collection of charges, were deemed non-taxable as they were in the nature of statutory obligations, not services provided for consideration. The Tribunal found penalties and extended period demands imposed on the appellant unsustainable, emphasizing that public authorities performing statutory duties are not engaged in taxable services. The appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 902 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, a statutory body performing mandatory statutory functions under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, is not liable to pay service tax. The activities, including fund management and collection of charges, were deemed non-taxable as they were in the nature of statutory obligations, not services provided for consideration. The Tribunal found penalties and extended period demands imposed on the appellant unsustainable, emphasizing that public authorities performing statutory duties are not engaged in taxable services. The appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>