https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341931 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided qualified as exports under Rule 3 of the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The Tribunal disagreed with the tax department's contention that the services fell under Business Auxiliary Service, citing precedents and holding that the services benefited the Singapore recipient's business activities. Consequently, the appellant was absolved of service tax liability, and the impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:03:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341931 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided qualified as exports under Rule 3 of the Export of Service Rules, 2005. The Tribunal disagreed with the tax department's contention that the services fell under Business Auxiliary Service, citing precedents and holding that the services benefited the Singapore recipient's business activities. Consequently, the appellant was absolved of service tax liability, and the impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341931