https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341923 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal on both issues. The rejection of the compounding facility for Aluminum Circles was deemed unjustified, and the appellant was held entitled to the compounding facility. Additionally, the appellant was not required to pay duty on the removal of scrap, as the rejection of exemption was unfounded. The Tribunal found that the appellant had acted in good faith and complied with the regulations, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant. en-us Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341923 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal on both issues. The rejection of the compounding facility for Aluminum Circles was deemed unjustified, and the appellant was held entitled to the compounding facility. Additionally, the appellant was not required to pay duty on the removal of scrap, as the rejection of exemption was unfounded. The Tribunal found that the appellant had acted in good faith and complied with the regulations, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341923