https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341919 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal on 17/03/2017. It found no evidence of improper credit or unauthorized use of inputs, rejecting the demand for duty, interest, and penalty. The absence of clandestine removal and lack of evidence for extended period recovery under the Central Excise Act, 1944 supported the decision in favor of the appellant. en-us Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:01:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341919 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal on 17/03/2017. It found no evidence of improper credit or unauthorized use of inputs, rejecting the demand for duty, interest, and penalty. The absence of clandestine removal and lack of evidence for extended period recovery under the Central Excise Act, 1944 supported the decision in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341919