https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341913 The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand interest and penalties against the appellant company for alleged fraudulent CENVAT credit availment. It found the department's case lacking substantial evidence, noting inconsistencies and insufficient proof linking the appellant to the alleged fraudulent activities. Emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, highlighting previous judgments where similar demands were dismissed due to lack of conclusive evidence. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 May 2017 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341913 The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand interest and penalties against the appellant company for alleged fraudulent CENVAT credit availment. It found the department's case lacking substantial evidence, noting inconsistencies and insufficient proof linking the appellant to the alleged fraudulent activities. Emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, highlighting previous judgments where similar demands were dismissed due to lack of conclusive evidence. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341913