<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 879 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341909</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the release of the seized printing machine upon the petitioners executing a Bond and imposing conditions for its safe custody. The court emphasized that the adjudication process must proceed irrespective of the findings in this order and that proper legal procedures should be followed without influence from this ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 879 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341909</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the release of the seized printing machine upon the petitioners executing a Bond and imposing conditions for its safe custody. The court emphasized that the adjudication process must proceed irrespective of the findings in this order and that proper legal procedures should be followed without influence from this ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>