<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 868 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify the nature of the transactions and, if found to be part of a composite arbitrage/hedging mechanism, to accept the additional income offered by the assessee and allow the adjustment of non-speculative income against the loss. The AO was also directed to rectify the error in the assessed income. The Tribunal emphasized the need for adequate opportunity for the assessee to present their case during the verification process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:57:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 868 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify the nature of the transactions and, if found to be part of a composite arbitrage/hedging mechanism, to accept the additional income offered by the assessee and allow the adjustment of non-speculative income against the loss. The AO was also directed to rectify the error in the assessed income. The Tribunal emphasized the need for adequate opportunity for the assessee to present their case during the verification process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>