<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 860 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341890</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the order demanding service tax on subsidized food supplied to workers. It emphasized the importance of establishing that an activity meets the definition of service before considering tax implications or exemptions, highlighting the significance of legal interpretation in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 860 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341890</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Writ Petition, setting aside the order demanding service tax on subsidized food supplied to workers. It emphasized the importance of establishing that an activity meets the definition of service before considering tax implications or exemptions, highlighting the significance of legal interpretation in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>