<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 860 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341890</link>
    <description>Subsidized food supplied by an employer to workers as part of the employment package and industrial obligation does not satisfy the statutory ingredients of &quot;service&quot; under Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, because it is not an independent activity rendered for consideration in the relevant sense. The arrangement was treated as employment-related, with the food value regarded as wages under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, rather than a separate taxable service. The demand was therefore unsustainable, and the supply could not be taxed merely because it occurred outside the registered premises or raised exemption-notification issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 860 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341890</link>
      <description>Subsidized food supplied by an employer to workers as part of the employment package and industrial obligation does not satisfy the statutory ingredients of &quot;service&quot; under Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994, because it is not an independent activity rendered for consideration in the relevant sense. The arrangement was treated as employment-related, with the food value regarded as wages under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, rather than a separate taxable service. The demand was therefore unsustainable, and the supply could not be taxed merely because it occurred outside the registered premises or raised exemption-notification issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>