<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 857 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for the refund of interest on the time-barred service tax demand. It held that when a demand is held as time-barred, the department&#039;s legal claim on the service tax is canceled, necessitating the refund of the interest portion. The Tribunal concluded that the rejection of the interest refund was unjustified and granted any consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 857 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for the refund of interest on the time-barred service tax demand. It held that when a demand is held as time-barred, the department&#039;s legal claim on the service tax is canceled, necessitating the refund of the interest portion. The Tribunal concluded that the rejection of the interest refund was unjustified and granted any consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>