<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 844 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the central excise duty demand on parts supplied for manufacturing a Fume Extraction System, ruling that the chimney shells were excisable. M/s. Isha Engg. &amp;amp; Fabricators&#039; appeal was dismissed as they manufactured and marketed the parts, establishing excise liability. However, M/s. KTMS Engg. Pvt. Ltd.&#039;s penalty was set aside as their role was not specified, and mere awareness of excise liability was insufficient for penalty imposition. The judgment was delivered on 23/03/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:06:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 844 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the central excise duty demand on parts supplied for manufacturing a Fume Extraction System, ruling that the chimney shells were excisable. M/s. Isha Engg. &amp;amp; Fabricators&#039; appeal was dismissed as they manufactured and marketed the parts, establishing excise liability. However, M/s. KTMS Engg. Pvt. Ltd.&#039;s penalty was set aside as their role was not specified, and mere awareness of excise liability was insufficient for penalty imposition. The judgment was delivered on 23/03/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>