<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 843 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341873</link>
    <description>The Department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed by disallowing credit for rent-a-cab services post-01.04.2011. The Tribunal upheld credit for canteen services and justified the non-imposition of a penalty for township security services. The impugned order was modified to reflect the decision, granting consequential reliefs accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 843 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341873</link>
      <description>The Department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed by disallowing credit for rent-a-cab services post-01.04.2011. The Tribunal upheld credit for canteen services and justified the non-imposition of a penalty for township security services. The impugned order was modified to reflect the decision, granting consequential reliefs accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>