<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 837 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341867</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Modvat Credit of Rs. 16,95,287, subject to verification by the Commissioner. The demand for Switch Expansion Joints was set aside, and the penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules 1944 was deemed unwarranted due to the absence of fraudulent conduct. The case was remanded for the calculation of Modvat, net demand payable/refundable, and any pre-deposits made by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:05:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 837 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341867</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Modvat Credit of Rs. 16,95,287, subject to verification by the Commissioner. The demand for Switch Expansion Joints was set aside, and the penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules 1944 was deemed unwarranted due to the absence of fraudulent conduct. The case was remanded for the calculation of Modvat, net demand payable/refundable, and any pre-deposits made by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>