<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 837 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341867</link>
    <description>Modvat or Cenvat credit forms part of the excise duty computation and cannot be denied merely because the claim was not pressed earlier, where no fraud or contumacious conduct is shown. The credit claim may still require verification of the amount admissible, and the matter may be remanded for computation of the net duty after allowing credit. Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 depends on culpable conduct such as suppression or deliberate evasion; in the absence of such findings, penalty is not sustainable. The decision also notes that any pre-deposit may be adjusted in the recalculation of duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:05:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 837 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341867</link>
      <description>Modvat or Cenvat credit forms part of the excise duty computation and cannot be denied merely because the claim was not pressed earlier, where no fraud or contumacious conduct is shown. The credit claim may still require verification of the amount admissible, and the matter may be remanded for computation of the net duty after allowing credit. Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 depends on culpable conduct such as suppression or deliberate evasion; in the absence of such findings, penalty is not sustainable. The decision also notes that any pre-deposit may be adjusted in the recalculation of duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>