<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 834 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341864</link>
    <description>Short landing of bulk cargo was established through the statement of facts, the steamer agent&#039;s certificate and the subsequent weighment certificate, all of which recorded shortage in the quantity landed. Since the cargo was bulk cargo and the port notes did not require a custodian certificate, rejection of the refund claim solely for want of that certificate was unjustified. The evidence placed before customs supported the claim that the goods had not fully landed, and the refund of excess customs duty was therefore allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 834 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341864</link>
      <description>Short landing of bulk cargo was established through the statement of facts, the steamer agent&#039;s certificate and the subsequent weighment certificate, all of which recorded shortage in the quantity landed. Since the cargo was bulk cargo and the port notes did not require a custodian certificate, rejection of the refund claim solely for want of that certificate was unjustified. The evidence placed before customs supported the claim that the goods had not fully landed, and the refund of excess customs duty was therefore allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>