<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 834 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341864</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs as the presiding Member concluded that the documents provided supported the appellant&#039;s claim of short landing of goods due to discrepancies in weighment. The rejection of the refund claims was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the significance of valid documentation and adherence to customs rules in import disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 834 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341864</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs as the presiding Member concluded that the documents provided supported the appellant&#039;s claim of short landing of goods due to discrepancies in weighment. The rejection of the refund claims was deemed unjustified, emphasizing the significance of valid documentation and adherence to customs rules in import disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>