https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341863 The appeal involved the interpretation of Notification No.158/95-Cus on the re-import of goods due to quality issues. The re-imported goods were released for re-processing and re-export, but lower authorities alleged a violation of notification conditions. Following a precedent, the Tribunal directed that if duty liability is imposed on the re-imported goods, the appellants should be considered for drawback on the duty recovered. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with the referenced judgment, ensuring consistent application of the law in similar cases. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341863 The appeal involved the interpretation of Notification No.158/95-Cus on the re-import of goods due to quality issues. The re-imported goods were released for re-processing and re-export, but lower authorities alleged a violation of notification conditions. Following a precedent, the Tribunal directed that if duty liability is imposed on the re-imported goods, the appellants should be considered for drawback on the duty recovered. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with the referenced judgment, ensuring consistent application of the law in similar cases. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341863