https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341857 The court allowed both applications and quashed the proceedings of the criminal cases as far as the applicant was concerned. The court emphasized that the complaints were not maintainable due to the non-arraignment of the company as an accused, citing the legal principle that vicarious liability requires the company to be arraigned. The court also held that the application under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. to implead the company was not maintainable at that stage. en-us Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:04:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341857 The court allowed both applications and quashed the proceedings of the criminal cases as far as the applicant was concerned. The court emphasized that the complaints were not maintainable due to the non-arraignment of the company as an accused, citing the legal principle that vicarious liability requires the company to be arraigned. The court also held that the application under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. to implead the company was not maintainable at that stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341857