<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 811 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for the inaccurate claim related to deduction under Section 80IB(10) on interest income from fixed deposits. The decision emphasized the significance of genuine claims supported by disclosed facts and legal interpretations in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:03:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 811 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for the inaccurate claim related to deduction under Section 80IB(10) on interest income from fixed deposits. The decision emphasized the significance of genuine claims supported by disclosed facts and legal interpretations in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>