<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 809 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341839</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, finding the protective assessment by the Assessing Officer invalid and not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized that jurisdictional issues must be addressed first and held that a protective assessment cannot stand without a substantive assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal on both the validity of the protective assessment and the jurisdictional issue, emphasizing the importance of adherence to legal principles in assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:03:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 809 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341839</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, finding the protective assessment by the Assessing Officer invalid and not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized that jurisdictional issues must be addressed first and held that a protective assessment cannot stand without a substantive assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal on both the validity of the protective assessment and the jurisdictional issue, emphasizing the importance of adherence to legal principles in assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>