<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1074 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191761</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court concurred with the Tribunal&#039;s decision that notional interest on interest-free security deposits should not be included in the income from house property. However, the court acknowledged the necessity for a larger bench to address the determination of fair rent in cases with significantly high security deposits compared to actual rent. The matter was referred to the Chief Justice for the constitution of a Full Bench to examine these concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:47:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1074 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191761</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court concurred with the Tribunal&#039;s decision that notional interest on interest-free security deposits should not be included in the income from house property. However, the court acknowledged the necessity for a larger bench to address the determination of fair rent in cases with significantly high security deposits compared to actual rent. The matter was referred to the Chief Justice for the constitution of a Full Bench to examine these concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>