https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341829 The Tribunal held that the mixture of solvents used by the appellant in manufacturing bulk drugs was not excisable under the Central Excise Act. The demands for duty, interest, and penalties were set aside for the period in question, relying on established case law precedents like the Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. case. The Tribunal found that the processes involved did not amount to manufacture as defined in the Act. Consequently, the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, and the lower authorities' decisions were overturned. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341829 The Tribunal held that the mixture of solvents used by the appellant in manufacturing bulk drugs was not excisable under the Central Excise Act. The demands for duty, interest, and penalties were set aside for the period in question, relying on established case law precedents like the Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. case. The Tribunal found that the processes involved did not amount to manufacture as defined in the Act. Consequently, the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, and the lower authorities' decisions were overturned. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341829