<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 798 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341828</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of a mistake in the order dated 01.6.2016 regarding interest liability under Rule 3(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that revisiting the issue would amount to reviewing the order, which is not within its jurisdiction as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case. The application was deemed devoid of merit and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:11:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 798 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341828</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification of a mistake in the order dated 01.6.2016 regarding interest liability under Rule 3(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that revisiting the issue would amount to reviewing the order, which is not within its jurisdiction as per the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case. The application was deemed devoid of merit and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>