<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 786 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341816</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The respondent was entitled to any consequential benefits according to the law. The dispute centered on the interpretation of Cenvat Credit Rules regarding the sale of surplus steam generated using furnace oil, with the Commissioner ruling in favor of the respondent on all key issues raised by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:10:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 786 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341816</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The respondent was entitled to any consequential benefits according to the law. The dispute centered on the interpretation of Cenvat Credit Rules regarding the sale of surplus steam generated using furnace oil, with the Commissioner ruling in favor of the respondent on all key issues raised by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>