https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341815 The Court denied the Revenue's request for a blanket stay of the CESTAT order pending appeal, finding insufficient justification provided. The assessee opposed an unconditional stay, arguing compliance with customs formalities and reduced duty demands. The Revenue's plea for an unconditional stay was rejected, with the Court emphasizing the lack of prejudice demonstrated and accepting the assessee's undertakings. The invocation of Rule 41 of CESTAT Procedural Rules was considered but not central to the decision, as the Court focused on the stay and implementation issues. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the Revenue's motion, highlighting the importance of the assessee's compliance with obligations. en-us Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341815 The Court denied the Revenue's request for a blanket stay of the CESTAT order pending appeal, finding insufficient justification provided. The assessee opposed an unconditional stay, arguing compliance with customs formalities and reduced duty demands. The Revenue's plea for an unconditional stay was rejected, with the Court emphasizing the lack of prejudice demonstrated and accepting the assessee's undertakings. The invocation of Rule 41 of CESTAT Procedural Rules was considered but not central to the decision, as the Court focused on the stay and implementation issues. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the Revenue's motion, highlighting the importance of the assessee's compliance with obligations. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341815