<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 783 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341813</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order and remanded the case for further adjudication, focusing on the period of limitation and the de minimis claim. The CESTAT was directed to hear the parties and dispose of the appeals by a specified date, ensuring comprehensive consideration of all submissions without expressing any opinion on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 783 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341813</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order and remanded the case for further adjudication, focusing on the period of limitation and the de minimis claim. The CESTAT was directed to hear the parties and dispose of the appeals by a specified date, ensuring comprehensive consideration of all submissions without expressing any opinion on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>