<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 782 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants, Shri Sanjoy and Shri B.R.B. Roy, for their active involvement in smuggling Sandal Wood and White Powder. The evidence, including witness statements and investigative findings, confirmed their significant roles in orchestrating the transportation and delivery of prohibited items. Despite assurances of cooperation, Shri Sanjoy&#039;s failure to appear before authorities indicated his complicity in the illicit activities. The Tribunal deemed the penalties justified based on the appellants&#039; substantial participation in the smuggling operation, leading to the dismissal of their appeals against the imposed penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 782 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants, Shri Sanjoy and Shri B.R.B. Roy, for their active involvement in smuggling Sandal Wood and White Powder. The evidence, including witness statements and investigative findings, confirmed their significant roles in orchestrating the transportation and delivery of prohibited items. Despite assurances of cooperation, Shri Sanjoy&#039;s failure to appear before authorities indicated his complicity in the illicit activities. The Tribunal deemed the penalties justified based on the appellants&#039; substantial participation in the smuggling operation, leading to the dismissal of their appeals against the imposed penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>