<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 780 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341810</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the company petition maintainable, recognizing the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to shares as the legal representative of her deceased father. The petitioner was granted interim relief, including the appointment of an independent auditor to investigate the management and affairs of the company. The Tribunal directed the respondent directors to render accounts and ordered both parties to submit names of independent auditors within 15 days, with the Tribunal reserving the right to appoint an auditor if necessary. Each party was to bear its own costs, and the interim order would not impact the main company petition or any pending civil suits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:04:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 780 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341810</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the company petition maintainable, recognizing the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to shares as the legal representative of her deceased father. The petitioner was granted interim relief, including the appointment of an independent auditor to investigate the management and affairs of the company. The Tribunal directed the respondent directors to render accounts and ordered both parties to submit names of independent auditors within 15 days, with the Tribunal reserving the right to appoint an auditor if necessary. Each party was to bear its own costs, and the interim order would not impact the main company petition or any pending civil suits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>