https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341808 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, finding that the Petitioner failed to prove that the services provided were consultancy services and not contract work. The cancellation of the work order was deemed justified based on information from the Income Tax Officer and the Petitioner's failure to provide evidence of additional tax payment. The Court rejected the allegation of a predetermined decision by the Respondent. Consequently, the stay on the 2nd Bid was lifted, and no costs were awarded. en-us Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341808 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, finding that the Petitioner failed to prove that the services provided were consultancy services and not contract work. The cancellation of the work order was deemed justified based on information from the Income Tax Officer and the Petitioner's failure to provide evidence of additional tax payment. The Court rejected the allegation of a predetermined decision by the Respondent. Consequently, the stay on the 2nd Bid was lifted, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341808