<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (12) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7567</link>
    <description>The revisional phrase &quot;any proceeding under this Act&quot; was treated as wide enough to include refund proceedings, so the Commissioner&#039;s power under section 33B extended to refund orders passed by the Income-tax Officer. The fact that the relevant assessment years pre-dated the provision did not matter because the refund applications themselves were proceedings under the Act. On double taxation relief, the Ceylon levy under section 20(7) was treated as a single tax with a basic rate and an additional 3% rate, and the relief provision was read to include that additional rate for computation purposes. The references were answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (12) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7567</link>
      <description>The revisional phrase &quot;any proceeding under this Act&quot; was treated as wide enough to include refund proceedings, so the Commissioner&#039;s power under section 33B extended to refund orders passed by the Income-tax Officer. The fact that the relevant assessment years pre-dated the provision did not matter because the refund applications themselves were proceedings under the Act. On double taxation relief, the Ceylon levy under section 20(7) was treated as a single tax with a basic rate and an additional 3% rate, and the relief provision was read to include that additional rate for computation purposes. The references were answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>