<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 774 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341804</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeals. The Assessee failed to meet the conditions for exemption under Section 80IB(10) due to non-compliance with the plot size requirement and failure to submit the completion certificate on time. The court held that filing the audit report in form 10CCB was directory, not mandatory. The judgments of the Tribunal were set aside where inconsistent with the court&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 774 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341804</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeals. The Assessee failed to meet the conditions for exemption under Section 80IB(10) due to non-compliance with the plot size requirement and failure to submit the completion certificate on time. The court held that filing the audit report in form 10CCB was directory, not mandatory. The judgments of the Tribunal were set aside where inconsistent with the court&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>